Version 1.0. | Go to Version 2.0
Sunday, March 27, 2005
Miracleman Still In Dispute
I don't keep as close an eye on comics industry news as I used to, but I do check up on Newsarama ever couple of weeks or so. That's how I found out that the rights to Miracleman - which I thought was settled in Neil Gaiman's favor - has not been settled after all and that Todd McFarlane is still putting up a fight for it.
One can't help but roll one's eyes at this feud between Gaiman and McFarlane - when will it end already? Why won't one side (preferably McFarlane) just give up and be gracious about it? On the other hand, the stakes are indeed high: the comics in dispute are now legendary - especially Alan Moore's defining run - and interest in the series has only increased with the amount of time it's been in limbo. It's not the greatest work of Moore (not even by a long shot, as there's From Hell, V for Vendetta, and Watchmen for starters) nor of Gaiman, but it's an enjoyable and thought-provoking superhero series at a time when that was still considered a novelty.
One can only hope this will end soon. And that big, lavish hardcover reprints will be published and take its place on my bookshelf.
One can't help but roll one's eyes at this feud between Gaiman and McFarlane - when will it end already? Why won't one side (preferably McFarlane) just give up and be gracious about it? On the other hand, the stakes are indeed high: the comics in dispute are now legendary - especially Alan Moore's defining run - and interest in the series has only increased with the amount of time it's been in limbo. It's not the greatest work of Moore (not even by a long shot, as there's From Hell, V for Vendetta, and Watchmen for starters) nor of Gaiman, but it's an enjoyable and thought-provoking superhero series at a time when that was still considered a novelty.
One can only hope this will end soon. And that big, lavish hardcover reprints will be published and take its place on my bookshelf.

